Somabhai vs District
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Fresh notice to respondent no.2 as well as newly added respondent no.3 returnable on 21.02.2012.Sd/-(R.M.Chhaya, J.) M.M.BHATT Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Khodabhai vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Heard Mr.Tattvam K. Patel, learned advocate for the petitioners.Issue Notice returnable on 21.02.2012.The State Government may file the affidavit-in-reply on, or before, that date.In addition to the normal mode of service, Direct Service is also permitted.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) ~gaurav~ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sheikh vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Notice returnable on 8.2.2012.Learned APP, waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1.Direct service to Respondent No.2 and to be served through In-charge Police Officer of Radhanpur Police Station, Radhanpur, District Patan.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gaurangkumar vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Ms.Thakker learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application.The permission to withdraw the application is granted. The application stands disposed of as withdrawn.(K.M.THAKER,J.) Suresh* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Unknown
Judges:
30 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Admit.Bailable warrant for the sum of Rs. 5000/- shall be issued against each of the accused.[JAYANT PATEL, J.] [PARESH UPADHYAY, J.] mandora/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dakshin vs State
Judges: S R Brahmbhatt
30 January, 2012·In this group of petitions, the petitioners have assailed the decision of the State of handing the duty of providing mid-day meals to school children from Class 1 to 8 to respondent no.4, a Non Governmental Organization (N.G.O.).The petitioners have assailed this decision, as contrary to the princip...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Smt
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Mr.Modi, learned counsel states that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the claimants.Heard.Though the driver of the tanker is negligent to the extent of 25%, the Insurance Company is exonerated. However, Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue as interim relief pending final disposal ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Gangaben
Judges:
30 January, 2012·1. Though served, none appears on behalf of respondent-original claimant.2. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 17.06.1995 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhavnagar in M.A.C.P. No.339/1989 whereby, the claim petition was partly allowed and respondent no....
High Court Of Gujarat
Mohammad vs State
Judges:
30 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA) Rule.Learned A.P.P. Mr.A.J. Desai waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.At the end of arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application. Hence, this app...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jaiminiben vs Bar
Judges:
30 January, 2012·Shri RC Jani states that all the documents/ certified copies as demanded by the petitioner has been supplied and thus petitioner's grievances would not now survive. Party-in-person at this stage requests for time to check it out whether the documents supplied are in order. At her request matter is a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.