Patel Dinesh Bhimji & 3 Opponents
Judges: Ravi R Tripathi, G B Shah Cr A 855 1989, G B Shah
17 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.B.SHAH) 1.0 Present appeal U/s. 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is directed against judgment and order dated 17th August 1989, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gondal, Dist. Rajkot (hereinafter referred to as 'the learned Session...
High Court Of Gujarat
Commissioner Of Police &
Judges: Md Shah
17 January, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 02.10.2011 passed by respondent No.1, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short” the Act) by detaining the detenu as a “bootlegger” as defined under Se...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gurjat
Judges: Z K Saiyed, Z K
17 January, 2012·1. The present applicant – original accused has preferred this Revision Application under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 29.6.1991 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanera, in Crimi...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat
Judges: Bankim N Mehta
17 January, 2012·The appellant has preferred this appeal under section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and challenged the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad on 31.12.2004 in Criminal Case No.285 of 2003 acquitting the respondents accused for the offence und...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arvindlal Babulal Dabgar & 2 Defendants
Judges: Ks Jhaveri
17 January, 2012·1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 05.11.1990 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [Auxi.] in M.A.C.P. No. 251 of 1987, whereby the claim petition was partly allowed and the original claimant was awarded total compensation of Rs.59,440/ along with interes...
High Court Of Gujarat
Harishbhai vs Regional
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Mr.Mishra, learned advocate for the petitioner, tenders additional affidavit, which is taken on record. Mr.Soni, learned advocate appearing for respondent No.2, seeks time to file rejoinder. S.O. to 01.02.2012.Sd/-[R.M.CHHAYA, J ] *** Bhavesh* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shreenidhi vs Surat
Judges:
17 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Mr.Anal Shah has filed the leave note. The request is made to adjourn the matter to 30.01.2012. The request is granted.In view of the fact that the interim relief granted earlier has expired on 14.12.2011, which could not be extended for administrative reasons,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Yunus vs State
Judges:
17 January, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Ms.Parmar, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application.Permission granted. Disposed of as withdrawn.(JAYANT PATEL, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) *bjoy Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Guj vs Kaledia
Judges:
17 January, 2012·Fresh Rule, returnable on 22.02.2012, in view of the fact that learned advocate for respondent No.1 has expired.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] ..mitesh..Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mohammad vs State
Judges:
17 January, 2012·1. This application has been preferred under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with the offence being CR No.I-147 of 2011 registered with Navsari Rural Police Station for the offences under Sections 379, 406, 407, 411 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code.2. Heard Mr. Ansa...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.