Harsoliya vs State
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the parties.Having regard to the averments made in the application not controverted by filing reply and oral submission, the applicant has shown sufficient ground to condone the delay. Hence delay of 661 days in filing the application for leave to appeal is condoned. Rule ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharatkumar vs Divisional
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Heard.On the facts and circumstances of the case sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay. The delay is, therefore, condoned and the application is granted. Rule is made absolute with no order as to costs. First Appeal to be listed for admission on 31.01.2012.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Land vs Umarbhai
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Rule returnable on 27.2.2012.(Rajesh H. Shukla,J) Jayanti* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kantaben vs Navsari
Judges:
23 January, 2012·Mr.N.V.Anjaria, learned advocate appearing for respondent No.3 in Special Civil Application No.5940 of 1995 has been elevated to the Bench of this Court, fresh notice is required to be issued to the respondent No.3.Issue fresh notice to respondent No.3 returnable after four weeks.( A.J. DESAI, J. ) ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Meenaben Wd/O Kantibhai Chandubhai Indrekarchhara Thro vs State Of Gujarat Thro Secretary &
Judges: Md Shah
23 January, 2012·The petitioner has been detained under the provisions of Gujarat Prevention of Anti- Social Activities Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act of 1985') by the order dated 29.09.2011 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, and he has been declared as bootlegger. Heard l...
High Court Of Gujarat
Radhaben W/O Dilipbhai Makwanathrough His Brother In Law vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges: Md Shah
23 January, 2012·The petitioner has been detained under the provisions of Gujarat Prevention of Anti- Social Activities Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act of 1985') by the order dated 06.10.2011 passed by the Police Commissioner, Rajkot City, and he has been declared as bootlegger. Heard lear...
High Court Of Gujarat
Niraj Jyotindrabhai Panchal Through His Father Jyotindrabhai vs Commissioner Of Police & 2
Judges: Md Shah
23 January, 2012·The petitioner has been detained under the provisions of Gujarat Prevention of Anti- Social Activities Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act of 1985') by the order dated 07.10.2011 passed by the Police Commissioner, Vadodara City, and he has been declared as bootlegger. Heard lea...
High Court Of Gujarat
Patel Mahendrakumar Ajitkumar Mafatlal vs State Of Gujarat & 1
Judges: M R Shah
23 January, 2012·1. The present Special Criminal Application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner herein – original accused to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 26/02/2008 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mahesana below Exh.79 i...
High Court Of Gujarat
Meghmani Organics Ltd vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Sonia Gokani
23 January, 2012·Rule. Learned advocate Mrs.Mauna Bhatt waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent. 2. Petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act. It is assessed to tax regularly under the Income Tax Act. By way of present petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge notice dated 23.3.201...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rathod Mohammedali Haji Bapu Saheb vs State Of Gujarat & 1
Judges: M R Shah
23 January, 2012·1. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner herein – original complainant to quash and set aside the order dated 23/08/2006 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Borsad below Exh.1 in Criminal Case No.940 of 2005 in...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.