Iliyas vs State
Judges:
03 February, 2012·Mr.UM Shastri, learned advocate for the applicant in both these matters, upon instructions, states that the matters are settled with the other side and seeks permission to withdraw both these matters.Permission as prayed for is granted. Both these applications stand disposed of as withdrawn.(J.C.UPA...
High Court Of Gujarat
Indra vs State
Judges:
03 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. DESAI) At the request of learned Advocate Mr. R.D. Dave for the appellant, the matter is adjourned to 21.2.2012.(V.M.SAHAI, J.) (A.J.DESAI, J.) pnnair Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pradhanji vs Sunil
Judges:
03 February, 2012·Mr.Ashish Shah, learned advocate appearing on behalf of original appellant prays for time to take instructions in the matter. At his request, the matter is adjourned to 10.2.2012.(HARSHA DEVANI, J.) (vipul) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahesh vs State
Judges:
03 February, 2012·1. This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with First Information Report registered as I-C.R.No.9 of 2011 with Vadodara City ACB Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) r/w. 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Ac...
High Court Of Gujarat
Heirs vs National
Judges:
03 February, 2012·Office objections to be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Matters to come up on 02.03.2012.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) Divya// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jagdishgiri vs State
Judges:
03 February, 2012·Learned advocate, Mr.B.Y.Mankad, is permitted to file his Vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant. S.O. to 9-2-2012.[M.D.SHAH,J.] radhan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Savitriben
Judges:
03 February, 2012·1. The appellant herein has challenged the award dated 17.11.1998 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux), Baroda in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 270 of 1995 so far as the Tribunal awarded Rs. 5,08,500/- by way of compensation to the original claimants along with 12% interest.2. It ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Urmilaben vs State
Judges:
03 February, 2012·1. Ms.Chitaliya, ld. AGP. on instructions from Mr. Thakor, who represents District Education Officer-respondent no.2 herein, states that the case of the petitioner for retiral benefits as prayed for in the petition cannot be considered. Earlier Affidavit-in-Reply is filed by the Education Inspector ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ismailbhai vs General
Judges:
03 February, 2012·The cause list shows that the notice qua respondent No.1 is not received back and though served, respondent No.3 has yet not entered appearance.In view of the remarks in the cause list, so far as respondent No.1 is concerned, learned advocate for the applicant has requested for fresh notice and has ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Tejabhai vs State
Judges:
03 February, 2012·The applicant-original accused of Criminal Case No.967 of 2006, who is convicted by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Upleta on 25.1.2011 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Against the said order Criminal Appeal being Criminal Appeal No.4 of 2...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.