Gujarat vs Appellate
Judges:
21 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Issue fresh notice to unserved respondent nos.1,9,10 and 12 returnable on 13.3.2012. Direct service by speed post at the cost of the petitioner is permitted.(V.M.SAHAI,J) (A.J.DESAI,J) ***vcdarji Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rameshchandra vs Union
Judges:
21 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Let the matter receive consideration of another Bench wherein one of us (A.L. Dave, J.) is not a party.[A.L.Dave, J.] [Mohinder Pal, J.] #MH Dave Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Baldevji vs State
Judges:
21 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL)1. Rule.Ms Shah learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the State.2. The present application has been preferred by the applicant-convict for temporary bail on the ground that his mother has expired on 14.2.2012. The death certificate is produced, hen...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rameshbhai Mohanbhai Patel & 2 vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges: M R Shah
21 February, 2012·1. Ms.P.J.Joshi, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner of Special Criminal Application No.2095 of 2008, under the instruction from her client, has stated at the bar that the parties have settled the dispute amicably and, therefore, she seeks permission to withdraw the presen...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jigarbhai Kiranbhai Panchal & 4 vs State Of Gujarat & 1
Judges: M R Shah
21 February, 2012·1. The present application u/s.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the applicants herein – original accused Nos.2 to 6 to quash and set aside the impugned FIR being C.R.No.I-82 of 2005 lodged with Aslali Police Station.2. Ms.Shilpa Shah, learned advocate app...
High Court Of Gujarat
Laxmanbhai Ruphasi Rajput & 1S vs Devshibhai Durgabhai Dalit & 1
Judges: M R Shah
21 February, 2012·1. The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the applicants- original accused to quash and set aside the impugned FIR, being FIR No. 3154/2008 registered with Tharad Police Station, Banaskantha for the offences punishable under Sections ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajan Ice Factory vs State Of Gujarat & 1
Judges: M R Shah
21 February, 2012·1. As common question of law and facts arise in these group of applications, they are disposed of by this common judgment and order.1.1. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 15964/2008 has been preferred by the applicant-original accused to quash and set aside the impugned FIR, being C.R. No. II 1...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajan Ice Factory vs State Of Gujarat & 1
Judges: M R Shah
21 February, 2012·1. As common question of law and facts arise in these group of applications, they are disposed of by this common judgment and order.1.1. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 15964/2008 has been preferred by the applicant-original accused to quash and set aside the impugned FIR, being C.R. No. II 1...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajan Ice Factory vs State Of Gujarat & 1
Judges: M R Shah
21 February, 2012·1. As common question of law and facts arise in these group of applications, they are disposed of by this common judgment and order.1.1. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 15964/2008 has been preferred by the applicant-original accused to quash and set aside the impugned FIR, being C.R. No. II 1...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mohammad Rafik Umarbhai Bhistis vs State Of Gujarat & 1
Judges: Z K Saiyed
21 February, 2012·1. Rule. Learned APP Mr. Jani waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.1 – State and learned Advocate Mr. Kanani waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.2 – wife.2. The applicant – husband of respondent No.2, has filed this application challenging the Judgment and or...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.