State vs Unknown
Judges:
22 February, 2012·Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the details mentioned by the office in the office note dated 21.2.2012, time to remove office objections is extended until 27.2.2012.The note dated 21.2.2012 is accordingly disposed of.(K.M.THAKER,J.) Suresh* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gautambhai vs Rasikbhai
Judges:
22 February, 2012·Notice to the respondents returnable on 5th March 2012. Direct service is permitted.To be placed with Special Civil Application No. 18780 of 2011 where the present petitioners are appearing on Caveat.{Ms. Sonia Gokani, J.} Prakash* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Divyant vs Commissioner
Judges:
22 February, 2012·Rule.Ms. Patel, learned AGP waives services of notice of Rule on behalf of respondents in these petitions. By consent, rule is fixed forthwith.In these three petitions, the facts are identical and impugned orders are also identical, hence, these petitions are being heard and disposed of by this comm...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sajeda vs State
Judges:
22 February, 2012·Heard Mr.Nilesh Pandya, learned advocate for Mr.UM Shastri, learned advocate for the petitioner and perused the relevant papers annexed with this petition. In the instant petition, the petitioner has challenged simultaneously two orders passed by the Family Court, Panchmahals at Godhra. The first or...
High Court Of Gujarat
Speical vs Patel
Judges:
22 February, 2012·The present Civil Applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act have been filed for condonation of delay caused in filing the First Appeals on the grounds stated in the application inter alia the procedural delay in getting necessary approval.Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Lalabhai vs State
Judges:
22 February, 2012·[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-293 of 2011 registered with Sabarmati Police Station.[2] It is vehemently submitted by the learned advocate for the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mohmmad vs State
Judges:
22 February, 2012·[1.0] Present Criminal Miscellaneous Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been preferred by the applicant herein - original accused to quash and set aside the FIR being I-C.R. No.19/2010 registered with Sutrapada Police Station, Veraval.[2.0] As the charge-sheet ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nishant vs State
Judges:
21 February, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that this matter is in a narrow compass, as the concerned authority i.e. respondent no.2 while issuing order dated 19.03.2010, has not taken into consideration the relevant factors germane for deciding the true and correct value of the land in questi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dineshbhai vs The
Judges:
21 February, 2012·1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-"(A) A writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing respondent no.1 and 3 to consider the case of the petitioner as a candid...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.