Ramji vs State
Judges:
23 February, 2012·Learned Counsel for the applicant does not press this application qua applicant No.1 - Ramji Bhikha Koli. Hence, this application stands disposed of as not pressed qua applicant No.1. Rule discharged qua applicant No.1 only.This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedur...
High Court Of Gujarat
Legal vs Seth
Judges:
23 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) This is an application for condonation of delay of 57 days in filing Letters Patent Appeal. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Considering the contents of the application, it cannot be said that the delay caused in filing the Appeal has remained totall...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharatbhai vs Punjiben
Judges:
23 February, 2012·On having heard learned advocates for the parties and on having considered the cause pleaded in the application as well in the Appeal-form- order No. 362/2011, the same is fixed for hearing on 29th March, 2012. Parties to maintain status quo in respect of suit property till the next date of hearing....
High Court Of Gujarat
Thakurji vs State
Judges:
23 February, 2012·Mr. GP Baghel, Ld.Advocate for the applicant, at this stage, does not press this application, reserving the liberty of the applicant to move appropriate forum for appropriate relief.Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The instant application stands disposed of as not pressed, reserving the libert...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dabhi vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
23 February, 2012·Learned advocate for the petitioner is present. However, the learned counsel for Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, who is the main contesting respondent, is not present, therefore, list the matter on 14-03-2012.Affidavit-in-reply, if any, by the contesting respondent be filed on, or before, that date...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dharnendrabhai vs State
Judges:
23 February, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Notice for final disposal returnable on 05.03.2012. Learned AGP waives service for the respondents.[D.H. WAGHELA, J.] [N.V. ANJARIA, J.] Amit Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bajaj vs Rashmikant
Judges:
23 February, 2012·Learned counsel for the appellant/s shall remove office objections within a period of four weeks from today. Matters to come for hearing on 26.03.2012.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Guliben vs State
Judges:
23 February, 2012·The actual date of detention is 10.11.2011. The Registry is directed to list this matter for final hearing in seriatim considering the actual date of detention.( M.D.Shah, J ) srilatha Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sameer vs State
Judges:
23 February, 2012·[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-299 of 2011 registered with Khatodara Police Station, Surat.[2] It is submitted by the learned advocate for the appl...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bajaj vs Kalpanaben
Judges:
23 February, 2012·1. In connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 25.10.2004 in which Joyalbhai Ashirwad Parmar expired, the legal heirs of deceased preferred claim petition being M.A.C.P. No.238/2005 u/s.163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Kheda at Nadiad...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.