Khetshi Hirji Shah vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges:
26 December, 2012·Heard Mr. Oza, learned advocate for the petitioner.It is submitted that the complaint/FIR is not investigated and steps have not been taken in pursuance of the FIR. It is also claimed that any arrest has not been made nor any steps of any nature appear to have been taken. However, when Mr. Oza, lear...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maganbhai Kariyabhai Bhuriya & vs State Of Gujarat Thro Prinicpal
Judges:
26 December, 2012·Mr.M.A. Kharadi, learned advocate for the petitioners, submits that he may be permitted to file an affidavit placing on record certain documents as per the order of the Court dated 05.09.2012. He is permitted to do so.List on 09.01.2013.(SMT. ABHILASHA KUMARI, J.) Piyush Page 2 of 2...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chairman - Indokem Ltd & 2 vs Shree Jagdish Industries
Judges:
26 December, 2012·Heard learned advocate Shri J.A. Adeshra for the appellants and learned advocate Shri NK Majmudar for the respondent.In view of the contentions raised, the matter requires consideration. Hence, ADMIT.(RAJESH H.SHUKLA, J.) (hn) Page 1 of 1 HC-NIC Page 1 of 1 Created On Mon Feb 12 23:22:44 IST 2018...
High Court Of Gujarat
Minaxiben @ Minaben Wd/O Bharatbhai Shanabhai Dalal & 2 vs Parbatsingh Doolsingh & 2S
Judges: Bhaskar Bhattacharya
26 December, 2012·1. This First Appeal is at the instance of the claimants in a proceeding under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and is directed against an award dated January 10, 1997 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No. IV at Ahmedabad [ “Tribunal”] in M.A.C.P. No. 83 of 1990, thereby awar...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sahileshkumar Shntilal Gandhi & 1 vs Sunil Babulal Dixit
Judges: Bhaskar Bhattacharya Page
26 December, 2012·1. These two appeals, at the instance of the claimants – parents, were heard analogously, as they arise out of a common award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Main), Vadodara, in M.A.C.P. No. 182 of 1993 and 183 of 1993 in which the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.75,000/- each, in favour o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sahileshkumar Shntilal Gandhi & 1 vs Sunil Babulal Dixit
Judges: Bhaskar Bhattacharya Page
26 December, 2012·1. These two appeals, at the instance of the claimants – parents, were heard analogously, as they arise out of a common award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Main), Vadodara, in M.A.C.P. No. 182 of 1993 and 183 of 1993 in which the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.75,000/- each, in favour o...
High Court Of Gujarat
United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Maniben Khimjibhai Ganava & 7S
Judges: Bhaskar Bhattacharya
26 December, 2012·1. First Appeal No. 2423 of 2002 is at the instance of the Insurance Company whereas the other appeal being First Appeal No. 754 of 2003 is at the instance of the claimants, by which the selfsame award passed by the Tribunal below has been challenged.2. The Tribunal has awarded a total sum o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sachin Udyognagar Sahakari Mandali Ltd vs State Of Gujarat & 4
Judges: M R Shah, S H Vora Page
26 December, 2012·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 270 of 2008 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1921 of 2008 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.H.VORA ================================================================1 Whether Report...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manjuben Wd/O Sureshkumar B Sharma & vs Mustakkhan R Pathan & 2S
Judges: Bhaskar Bhattacharya
26 December, 2012·1. This First Appeal is at the instance of the claimants in a proceeding under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and is directed against an award dated September 26, 1994, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal[Main], Banaskantha at Palanpur [“the Tribunal”] in M.A.C.P. No. 705 of 19...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ravi Electronics Thro vs Assistant Commercial Tax Commissioner
Judges: Akil Kureshi
26 December, 2012·In all these writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged Notices issued by the competent officer of the Sales Tax Department of the State of Gujarat for the purpose of reopening of previously closed assessments. Such notices are challenged on two grounds – Firstly, that the same were time barre...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.