Indian vs State
Judges: K M Thaker
13 August, 2012·The contesting parties have submitted that the petitioner is going to file his reply affidavit.The reply affidavit to be filed in Registry. The hearing of the petition is adjourned to 21.8.2012. Ad-interim, if any, granted earlier to continue till then.(K.M.THAKER,J.) Suresh*...
High Court Of Gujarat
Babulal J Suthar vs Principal Secretary & 2
Judges:
09 August, 2012·Rule. To be heard with Special Civil Application No. 6224 of 2011 [K.S.JHAVERI, J] Siddharth// HC-NIC Page 1 of 1 Created On Fri Dec 23 00:56:55 IST 2016...
High Court Of Gujarat
Priyanka Gems vs Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: Vijay Manohar Sahai, N V Anjaria
09 August, 2012·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17402 of 2011 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA ================================================================1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Priyanka Gems vs Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: Vijay Manohar Sahai, N V Anjaria
09 August, 2012·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17401 of 2011 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA ================================================================1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rameshchandra Bhikhalal Soni vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: D H Waghela
09 August, 2012·1. The petitioner has been, by impugned order dated 22.3.2004, convicted for the offence punishable under section 66 (1) (b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, (for short, “the Act”) and sentenced to simple imprisonment for three months and fine of rupees five hundred. Learned counsel Mr.Buddhabhatti, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat vs Mithhu Ali Odheja Opponents
Judges: Z K Saiyed
09 August, 2012·1. The present acquittal Appeal has been filed by the appellant – original complainant, State of Gujarat under Section 378 of the Cr.P.C., against the Judgment and order dated 10.2.1995 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kutch at Bhuj, in Sessions Case No.52 of 1992. The said case w...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jamnagar Municipal Corporation & 3
Judges: R M Chhaya
09 August, 2012·1. Rule. Mr. J.P. Bhatt, learned Advocate appears for respondent nos. 1 and 3 and waives notice of rule, Ms. Asmita Patel, learned Assistant Government Pleader appears for respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 and waives notice of rule.2. As such by order dated 23.12.2011 this Court (Coram: S.R. Brahmbhatt, J....
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat
Judges: Abhilasha Kumari
09 August, 2012·1. The present application reveals a startling and disturbing state of affairs.2. The applicant was in custody in connection with an FIR, being C.R. No.I18/2008, registered with Bavla Police Station, for offences punishable under Sections 365, 394, 397 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Sect...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat vs Ashishkumar P Mehta &
Judges: Z K Saiyed
09 August, 2012·1. The present Appeal, under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is filed by the appellant – State of Gujarat against the Judgment and order dated 28.08.1992 passed by the learned City Sessions Judge, Court No.3, Ahmedabad, in Sessions Case No. 3 of 1992, whereby the learned Judge...
High Court Of Gujarat
Areez P Khambhata
Judges: V M Sahai, N V Anjaria
09 August, 2012·We have heard Mr. M. R. Bhatt, learned senior standing counsel assisted by Ms.Mauna Bhatt, learned counsel for appellant. 2. This tax appeal has been filed on the following two proposed substantial questions of law.“[A]. Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in allowing assesse...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.