Dhiraj vs State
Judges:
09 April, 2012·Leave to delete certain averments made in ground [c] of paragraph 3 of the petition is granted.However, keeping in mind the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of D.K. Basu vs. State of West Bengal, reported in AIR 1997 SC 610, the respondents shall render explanation on affidavit by 13.4.20...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Mr R Ckodekar Addl.Public ...
Judges:
09 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) The applicant has history of abscondance, his appeal is also fixed for final hearing today before us and is likely to be disposed of. In that view of the matter, the applicant is rejected.[A.L. DAVE, J.] [N.V. ANJARIA, J.] Amit Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jagdip vs State
Judges:
09 April, 2012·Notice returnable on 08/05/2012.(K.M.THAKER, J.) (ila) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chetan vs District
Judges:
09 April, 2012·The endorsement on the Board indicates that Notice issued to respondent No.1, has not been received back, either served or unserved. Registry to await service of Notice upon the said respondent.List on 01.05.2012.(Smt. Abhilasha Kumari, J.) rakesh/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vignatriben vs Special
Judges:
09 April, 2012·Mr.Nikhil S.Kariel, learned advocate for the petitioners, states that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition, with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.Permission to withdraw the petition, with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action, is granted.The...
High Court Of Gujarat
Atmarambhai vs State
Judges:
09 April, 2012·Leave to join persons as respondent Nos. 4 to 6 as per draft amendment submitted today.Draft amendment to be carried out forthwith and issue Notice to newly joined respondents returnable on 27.4.2012.Direct service qua newly joined respondents permitted.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dharmendrabhai vs State
Judges:
09 April, 2012·1 Rule.Service is waived. Upon the joint request made by the learned advocates for the parties, this matter is taken up for final disposal.2 This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [for short, 'the Code'] is filed by the applicants to quash the FIR being C.R. No.I-...
High Court Of Gujarat
Troikaa vs Akums
Judges:
09 April, 2012·1. Heard Ms. Manisha Lavkumar, learned advocate for Mr. Y.J. Trivedi for the plaintiff. By an order passed below Exh.1 dated 9.4.2012 by the Second Additional District Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) in Civil Suit No.7 of 2012, the present suit is placed before this Court. Considering the provisions of Sec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dakshin vs Land
Judges:
09 April, 2012·Heard learned advocates for the parties.The petitioner power distribution company has approached this Court by way of this petition challenging the order dated 9/1/2012 where under the Electricity Ombudsman, Gujarat State, has accepted the contention of respondent No.1 that the estimate raised for s...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Rule Served For
Judges:
09 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.L. SONI) Considering the averments made in para 3,4 and 5 of the application, we are satisfied that the applicant has sufficiently explained the delay occurred in filing the first appeal. Accordingly, this application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Rule is made absolut...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.