Commissioner vs Whether The
Judges:
18 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Draft amendment is allowed. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.These Appeals are ADMITTED on the following substantial questions of law:1. Whether the Tribunal below committed substantial error of law in misinterpreting the provi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Indiraben vs Rajeshkumar
Judges:
18 April, 2012·1. By way of this appeal, the present appellants-original claimants have challenged the judgement and award dated 20.03.2001, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Panchmahals at Godhara, in M.A.C.P. No.705 of 1993, whereby the tribunal has awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.3,49,000/- to...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rammilan vs None For
Judges:
18 April, 2012·In view of inaccurate facts or statements made in paragraph No.2 of the application, the learned advocate Mr.Uday R. Bhatt for the applicants seeks permission to withdraw the application with a liberty to move fresh application for the same relief. Permission as prayed for is granted. The applicatio...
High Court Of Gujarat
Natvarsinh vs Unknown
Judges:
18 April, 2012·1. The present appellants have preferred this Appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 3.5.2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nadiad, in Sessions Case No.103 of 2001, whereby the learned Sessions...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dasuben vs Chandubhai
Judges:
18 April, 2012·1. By way of these appeal, the appellants -original claimants have challenged the judgement and award dated 9.2.2004, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Auxiliary) Bharuch, in M.A.C.P. No.766 of 1991, whereby the tribunal has awarded compensation in a sum of Rs.1,85,000/- to the claimants ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hiralal vs State
Judges:
18 April, 2012·This note for speaking to minutes is allowed in the following term :-The words "Additional Director General, CID" appearing in paras 8[i], [ii] & [iii] be read as "Additional Director General [Law & Order]", in the order dated 18.04.2012 passed by this Court in Special Criminal Application No.3065 o...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat vs Hirabhai
Judges:
18 April, 2012·(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH)1. RULE.The present application under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the applicant-State of Gujarat for leave to appeal against the impugned judgment and order of acquittal dated 18/04/2012 passed by the learned Princi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Riddhi vs Unknown
Judges:
18 April, 2012·The present petition is filed by the Transferee Company as abovenamed in the proposed scheme of amalgamation of Navkar Broking Services Private Limited and Riddhi Trade Services Private Limited, and Transferor companies with Vishwa Realty Limited, the Transferee Company.Heard Learned Ms.Vaibhavi Par...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dineshbhai vs Special
Judges:
18 April, 2012·In view of the office note, Fresh Rule is ordered to be issued to the Respondents returnable on 26.6.2012.(Rajesh H. Shukla,J) Jayanti* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
United vs Ibrahimbhai
Judges:
18 April, 2012·1. By way of these appeals, the appellant-original opponent No.2 has challenged the judgment and award dated 30.04.2004, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Auxi.), Amreli, in M.A.C.P. No.32 of 2002, whereby the tribunal has awarded compensation in the sum of Rs. 1,19,200/- to the claimant ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.