Asim vs Nilsin
Judges:
20 April, 2012·Heard Ms. Shah, learned advocate for the applicant, and Ms. Mehta, learned advocate for the opponent.Ms.Mehta, learned advocate for the opponent, has fairly submitted that if the request, as prayed for by the applicant in present application is granted, the opponent has no objection.In view of the s...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maulik vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
20 April, 2012·1. The applicant has taken out present application seeking below mentioned relief:"8(A) Your Lordships be pleased to grant an early date for final hearing of Special Civil Application NO.9375 of 2003"2. The petition has been preferred in 2003. Other old / senior matters are pending in the cause list...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jitendrabhai vs State
Judges:
20 April, 2012·[1.0] RULE.Shri L.B. Dabhi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondents. In the facts and circumstances of the case and with the consent of learned advocates appearing for respective parties, present application is taken up for final hearing tod...
High Court Of Gujarat
Whether vs Gajraben
Judges:
20 April, 2012·[1.0] Present Civil Application has been preferred by the appellant herein - original plaintiff for interim relief during the pendency of the main Second Appeal to stay further implementation, operation and execution of the judgment and decree dated 18.07.2011 passed by the learned Additional Distri...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rakeshkumar vs Jyoti
Judges:
20 April, 2012·Ms.Samata Patel, learned advocate for Ms. Ami Bhatt for the petitioner and Mr. Hemang Rawal, learned advocate for the respondent have submitted that the parties have amicably settled the issue out of Court which has reduced into consent terms duly signed by the parties being heirs of deceased Satpal...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayesh vs As
Judges:
20 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) As prayed for by Mr. Shah, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Bank, let affidavit-in-reply be given within a week. Rejoinder, if any within 3 days thereafter. Let the matter appear after a fortnight i.e. on May 4, 201...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajendra vs District
Judges:
20 April, 2012·Rule.Learned AGP, Mr.Maulik Nanavati, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent No.3-Jail Authority. The Registry is directed to list this matter for final hearing in seriatim considering the actual date of detention. Direct service qua respondents No.1 and 2 is permitted.( M.D.Shah, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Legal
Judges:
20 April, 2012·In view of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Deepal Girishbhai Soni & ors. V/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Baroda reported in [2004] 5 S.C.C. 385, Appeal Admitted.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION1. Rule returnable on 18.06.2012.2. In the meantime, ad-interim relief in t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Miss Cm Shah
Judges:
20 April, 2012·1. By filing this application, the applicant has prayed to condone delay of 7 days caused in filing the criminal appeal.2. Heard learned advocate Mr. Jadeja for the applicant learned APP for the opponent No.1. Opponent No.2 is served, but none appeared.3. Having regard to the averments made in the a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Mr Sp Majmudar For
Judges:
20 April, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.L. SONI)1. Applicant seeks condonation of 23 days occurred in filing the first appeal.2. Considering the contents of the application, we are inclined to allow this application and condone the delay occurred in filing the first appeal. Accordingly, this application is a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.