Gujarat High Court Judgements Directory

Judges:

29 February, 2000·1. Both the courts have not considered it to be a fit case to exercise their discretionary powers to grant interim relief in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner is claiming himself to be in possession of the suit property but both the courts below have concurrently held that he is not in poss...

Judges:

29 February, 2000·#. The present revision application has been filed by the original defendant against whom the present opponent had filed the suit being Regular Civil Suit No.374/80 in the court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, at Ankleshwar. The case of the plaintiff in the said suit was that the plaintiff is the o...

Judges:

29 February, 2000·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 1838 of 1999 in SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 9362 of 1999 For Approval and Signature:Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKAR and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.P.BUCH ============================================================1. Whether Reporters of L...

Judges:

29 February, 2000·1. It is an unfortunate litigation between the husband and a wife and more unfortunate is that they are of sufficiently advanced age. This is an age where they have to live together and give company to each other but they are fighting in the court. Be that as it may.2. Under the impugned order, the ...

Judges:

29 February, 2000·#. The present revision application has been filed by the original defendant of Regular Civil Suit No.396/79. The aforesaid suit was filed by the present respondent in the court of Civil Judge ( J.D.) Junagadh. It is the case of the plaintiff that he is the owner of the suit premises situated in Ka...

Judges:

29 February, 2000·1. The appellant who is the original defendant no.1 in Special Civil Suit No.39 of 1996 pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gandhidham has filed this Appeal From Order against the common order dated 22.9.1999 passed below Ex. 44,86 and 73.2. The application Ex. 44 was under...

Judges:

29 February, 2000·#. The petitioner herein is the original plaintiff of H.R.P. Suit No.859/75. The aforesaid suit was filed by the plaintiff against the present respondent tenant for getting decree for possession of the suit premises. It is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant is a tenant of the rear portion ...

Judges:

29 February, 2000·1. It is an unfortunate litigation in between husband and a wife and more unfortunate is that they are of advanced age having grown-up children who are residing with the petitioner.2. The petitioner filed a regular civil suit No.210 of 1995 in the court of 2nd Jt. Civil Judge (S.D.), Vadodara for d...

Judges:

29 February, 2000·On bifurcation of the Panchmahals District into two districts, namely, Panchmahals and Dahod, it appears that the petitioners were sent for an indefinite period from R&B Department of District Panchayat, Panchmahals at Godhra to R&B Department of District Panchayat, Dahod. Their services might be re...

Judges:

29 February, 2000·#. Heard Mr.N.M.Kapadia, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr.K.T.Dave, learned AGP appearing for respondents No. 1, 2 & 3. #. The petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by one Kishorbhai Dayalbhai Khalasi to challenge the detention order dated 9-7-1999 passed by the...