Bombay High Court Judgements Listing

Judges: Shaw, Blanesburgh, A Ali

26 June, 1924·10. It is now important to determine the point and scope of the consent given by the Raja to the receivership. On February 12, 1910, it was in these terms:-- That your petitioner has no objection to the appointment of a receiver as prayed for by the applicants, and submits that a proper and represen...

Judges: Shaw, Blanesburgh, A Ali

26 June, 1924·3. In these circumstances the Receiver brought his suit before the Subordinate Judge of Darbhanga, claiming:-- 1. That the decree holder may be directed to render an account of all his collections of the said mauza from the date of the decree to the present date. 2. That the decree-holder may be dir...

Judges: L Shah, Kt, Fawcett

26 June, 1924·3. In the application before us the case on behalf of the applicant has been argued on the footing of the findings recorded by the Sessions Judge. We are no longer concerned with the obstruction alleged to have been caused to the complainant as regards the account books, because the learned Judge ha...

Judges: L Shah, Kt, Fawcett

24 June, 1924·It is hereby declared that the said land shall be continued, so long as the village communities may require the services, as the service emoluments apper, tuning to the office of Ghadi on the following conditions:--that is to say, that the holders thereof shall perform the usual service to the commu...

Judges: Shaw, Blanesburgh, J Edge, A Ali

19 June, 1924·9. To a consideration of these circumstances their lordships now proceed. 10. The Rajah of Kalahasti-party to the transaction in question -succeeded in 1905 to the Taluk of Pamur. The Taluk consisted of 223 villages, and at the succession of the Rajah it was in a state of the utmost embarrassment. 1...

Judges: L Shah, Kt, Fawcett

10 June, 1924·1. The appellant in this case, who was the decree-holder, applied for execution of the decree by sale of a certain ginning factory. In execution the date for putting it up for sale was fixed, and on that date the bid did not go beyond Rs. 5,000. It appears, however, that the property was valued by a...