HEIRS OF JT FAMILY OF DECD PARSHOTTAM KASHIBHAI PATEL....Petitioners Versus CHANDULAL BHOGILAL SHAH,SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HEIRS & L.R. & 2....Respondents ====================================== Appearance:
MR NITIN N PANDYA, ADVOCATE for the Petitioners No. 1 1.5 MR. A. J. PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Petitioners No. 1.1 1.2 , 1.4 1.5 MR. RAKESH R. PATEL, AGP for the Respondents No. 2 3 RULE SERVED BY DS for the Respondents No. 1.1 1.2 ====================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT Date : 18/10/2013 ORAL ORDER
1. On 15th October, 2013, this Court had passed the following order.
"This matter was called out today, none has remain present for the parties. Matter is of that of year 1995 and therefore there was no scope for granting further adjournment. However by way of an exception and in order to afford an opportunity matter is ordered to be kept on 18/10/2013, with a specific observation that no further time shall be granted and same shall be disposed of by appropriate order, that may include dismissal for default.
Put up on 18/10/2013."
HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Wed Jul 20 01:39:33 IST 2016 C/SCA/10365/1995 ORDER
2. Today, when the matter was calledout, none is present. Hence, it is required to be dismissed for default. Rule discharged.
(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) Rathod...
HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Wed Jul 20 01:39:33 IST 2016