Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Hasmat vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16734 of 2019 Petitioner :- Hasmat Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amar Nath Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Heard Sri Amar Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for the State.
By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has invoked extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. dated 30.03.2019, registered as Case Crime No.136 of 2019, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, Police Station-Thana Bhawan, District-Shamli.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned first information report has been lodged by the respondent no.3, Sandeep Baliyan (S.H.O.) containing absolutely false and concocted allegations against the petitioner with the ulterior intention of harassing him. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in Case Crime No.42 of 2018 under Section 3/5/8 of Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act in which he has already been granted bail. He further submitted that apart from the bald allegations made in the impugned F.I.R. no evidence is forthcoming even prima facie indicating at the complicity of the petitioner in the commission of the alleged crime and hence the impugned F.I.R. is liable to be quashed.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. contended that the allegations made in the first information report cannot be aborted at this stage.
The petitioner will have sufficient opportunity to rebut the allegations.
From perusal of the F.I.R., prima facie cognizable offences is made out at this stage against the petitioner, therefore, we do not find any cogent reason to quash the first information report. The prayer for quashing the first information report is refused.
However, in the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner, it is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested in the aforesaid case till the submission of police report under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C., subject to the restraint that he shall co-operate with the investigation and shall appear as and when called upon to assist in the investigation.
With the above direction, this petition is finally disposed of Order Date :- 24.6.2019 SK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Hasmat vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 June, 2019
Judges
  • Naheed Ara Moonis
Advocates
  • Amar Nath