Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Haseen vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 24
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18409 of 2018 Applicant :- Haseen Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Anita Singh,Nirmla Kumari,Prem Babu Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Certified copy of the bail orders filed today are taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has not committed any offence. Recovery is false, planted and is not supported by any independent evidence. Learned counsel has also referred to the contents of the F.I.R. and argued that four persons are said to be arrested in this case in connection with the alleged recovery, but they were not informed separately about their legal rights to be searched before the Magistrate / Gazetted Officer, but a joint offer was given to them, which is illegal. In this case, there is a recovery of 170 grams Alprazolam powder against the commercial quantity of 100 grams. It is further submitted that in all the criminal cases shown as criminal history of the applicant, he is on bail. It is further contended that the mandatory provisions of N.D.P.S Act have not been complied with in the present case. The applicant is in jail since 15.5.2017 and in case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the quantity of recovered contraband, nature of the offence, provisions for release of accused on bail, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, and submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Haseen involved in Case Crime No.84 of 2017 (case no.101 of 2017) under Section 8/21 N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station G.R.P., Agra, District - Agra be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this Court.
Order Date :- 29.5.2018 / ss
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Haseen vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 May, 2018
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Anita Singh Nirmla Kumari Prem Babu Verma