Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32744 of 2018 Applicant :- Haseen @ Guddu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sudarshan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Sudarshan Singh,learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned AGA for the State and perused the material brought on record.
The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant is not named in the FIR, his name has been mentioned by the co-accused in the confessional statement. Applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. There is delay of seven days in lodging of the FIR without any plausible explanation. Further submission is that the alleged recovery has been planted by the Police to implicate the applicant in the present case. There is no independent witness of the alleged recovery. Further submission is that criminal history of the applicant has been explained in paragraph 9 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. Further submission is that applicant who is in jail since 4.10.2016 has no other criminal history and there is also no possibility of his either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Applicant also undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any view on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicant Haseen @ Guddu, be released on bail in Case Crime No. 517 of 2016, under Sections 307 IPC, Police Station- Hafizganj, District- Bareilly, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
(i) The applicant will co-operate with the trail and remain present personally on each and every date fixed after release. (ii) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever. (iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities. (iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
Order Date :- 28.8.2018/ssm