Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Haseen Bano And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23425 of 2018 Petitioner :- Haseen Bano And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Sri B.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Pawan Kumar Mishra holding brief of Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and Sri N.K. Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This petition has been filed with the prayer to quash the FIR dated 5.8.2018, Case Crime No.781 of 2018, u/s 135 Indian Electricity (Amended) Act, 2003 Act, P.S.Civil Lines, district Rampur.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that there has been some dispute between the petitioners and the Power Corporation with respect to electricity settlement dues for which the present proceeding has been filed by the Power Corporation for a malicious prosecution. The offence is compoundable and the petitioners are ready to settle the dispute.
Learned counsel for the respondent no.4 as well as learned AGA disputed the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that there has been some dispute regarding the dues in question but they may approach the authorities concerned for settlement outside the Court as there is provision under Section 152 of the Electricity Act for compounding the offence to which the learned counsel for the petitioners are ready to participate for compounding the proceeding before the authorities.
Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is directed to file an application within three weeks from today before the authorities concerned for settlement of dispute of electricity dues between the petitioner and respondent no.4. The concerned authority shall allow the proceeding for compounding the proceeding and shall pass appropriate orders within three weeks thereafter in accordance with law positively.
For a period of six weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners in the aforesaid case.
With the above direction, this petition is finally disposed of.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 28.8.2018 Gaurav
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Haseen Bano And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 August, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Brijesh Kumar Pandey