Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20943 of 2021 Applicant :- Harveer Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Upendra Upadhyay,Ambrish Kumar Kashyap Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ajay Kumar Vashistha,Amit Daga
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Counter affidavit filed on behalf of complainant, is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party, learned AGA, appearing for the State and perused the material brought on record.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case only for the harassment. It is next contended that all the co-accused persons has been granted bail by the court below and the case of applicant was at the better footing to the case of co-accused persons, the said fact has been mentioned in para 13 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. It is further contended that since the matter was pending prior to the posting of the applicant and also it was not the official duty of the applicant to make necessary entry in Revenue Record which is the duty of Registrar Kanungo, but the applicant has been falsely roped in the present case without any material against him, the said fact has been mentioned in para 15 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 08.04.2021. It has been pointed out that the applicant has no criminal history.
Learned counsel for opposite party as well as learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.
Courts have taken notice of the overcrowding of jails during the current pandemic situation (Ref.: Suo Motu Writ Petition (c) No. 1/2020, Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in prisons before the Supreme Court of India). These circumstances shall also be factored in while considering bail applications on behalf of accused persons.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicant- Harveer Singh, be released on bail in Case Crime No. 140 of 2019, under Sections- 420, 468 IPC, Police Station- Pilua, District- Etah, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of Rs. Two Lacs each (One should be of a family member) before the magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
1. The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the present case and conclude the same expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 21.9.2021 Arti