Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Harun vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10875 of 2018 Petitioner :- Harun Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Sri Ashutosh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri N.K.Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned FIR as well as material brought on record. The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 6.4.2018, registered as Case Crime No.95 of 2018, under Sections 3, 5, 8 of Cow Slaughter Act & 11 of Cruelty to Animals Act, Police Station Mainather, District Moradabad.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with malafide intention. He further submits that the petitioner was not arrested on the spot. The incident has taken place on 6.4.2018 but the recovery has been made on 5.4.2018. The allegations levelled against the petitioner is absolutely false, frivolous and baseless. From a perusal of the FIR, no offence is made out against the petitioner, hence, the same be quashed.
Learned AGA opposed the prayer for quashing of the FIR which discloses cognizable offence.
The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha v. State of U.P. (2006 (56) ACC 433) reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal v. State of U.P. (2000 Cr.L.J. 569) after considering the various decisions including State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604) that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the Police to investigate a case.
From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying the arrest of the petitioner.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 30.4.2018/NS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Harun vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Ashutosh Sharma