Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Harsita Maurya vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 43
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 1214 of 2019 Petitioner :- Harsita Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Sri Deepak Mishra, the learned A.G.A. rightly raised a preliminary objection that against the order impugned, an appeal under Section 101 and a revision under Section 102 of the J.J. Act, 2015 lay before the Court of Sessions, which the learned counsel for the petitioners is unable to meet.
The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy.
However, in the event, petitioners file an appeal / revision, as the case may be, within 3 weeks from today, same shall be entertained without raising any plea of limitation.
The office is directed to return certified copy of the documents after retaining a xerox thereof.
Order Date :- 20.12.2019 Chandra
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Harsita Maurya vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Rajesh Kumar Singh