Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Haroon Ahmad And Others vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10684 of 2021 Applicant :- Haroon Ahmad And 9 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Maohammd Nadeem,Ashish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State.
Applicants- Haroon Ahmad, Mohsin alias Happy, Afsar, Shanu, Sajid, Mohd. Saif, Arif, Asif, Jaris Mohsind seek anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 214 of 2021, under Section 188, 269, 270, 388, 504, 506 IPC and section 3(1) of Disaster Management (Amendment) Act 2020 and section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act. 1932, P.S. Kotwali Gursahaiganj, District Kannauj.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants states that he does not want to press this anticipatory bail application and the applicants are ready to surrender and apply for regular bail.
In view of the statement made, in case, the applicants appear/surrender before the court below and apply for regular bail in the aforesaid case, the same be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law.
With the above directions, the anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 24.9.2021 R Digitally signed by RAJIV GUPTA Date: 2021.09.24 16:51:56 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Haroon Ahmad And Others vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 September, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Maohammd Nadeem Ashish Kumar