Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7964 of 2018 Petitioner :- Harivansh Singh Respondent :- Commissioner Vindhyachal Mandal And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Narayan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ram Babu Yadav
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Heard Sri Shyam Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel.
This writ petition is preferred for seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent no.1 /Commissioner, Vindhyachal Mandal, Mirzapur, to decide Revision no.2014160000265 of 2011 (Harivansh Singh Vs. Km. Saroj and others), within a stipulated period.
The learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petition pending, it be disposed of by giving appropriate direction to the authority concerned.
The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no.1 /Commissioner, Vindhyachal Mandal, Mirzapur, to decide Revision no.2014160000265 of 2011 (Harivansh Singh Vs. Km. Saroj and others), either on the next date fixed, but not later than 3 months from the date of production of certified copy of the order.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall not seek any adjournment and so also is expected from the private respondents in the pending case, except for strong and compelling reasons, else would attract an exemplary cost of not less than Rs.250/- payable to the other side.
It is clarified that the proceedings as far as possible should not be repeatedly adjourned, merely on the ground that the Presiding Officer is busy in administrative work.
Order Date :- 27.2.2018 N.S.Rathour