Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Harigyan Singh And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4727 of 2019 Petitioner :- Harigyan Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Babu Lal Ram Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-IX,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttar Pradesh.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 30.12.2018 registered as Case Crime No. 489 of 2018 under Sections 324 & 379 I.P.C., Police Station- Roora, District- Kanpur Dehat.
This Court has the occasion to peruse the F.I.R. and the F.I.R. in question does disclose a cognizable offence. In view of this, there is no occasion for this Court to quash the F.I.R. as has been prayed on behalf of petitioner. As such, prayer made on the said score is refused by this Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioners next contended that the offence in question as has been alleged to have been committed by the petitioners is under Sections 324 & 379 I.P.C., and the said offence, even if the charges are found to be proved, sentence of more than 7 years can not be awarded and in view of this, mechanically arrest should not be effectuated by the police personnel.
The fact of the matter is that till date, arrest has not been effectuated and this is mere apprehension of the petitioners that they would be arrested in breach of provisions as contained under Section 41(1)(b) read with Section 41-A of the Cr.P.C. Once there is statutory provision provided for, then it is always expected that the said provisions would be adhered to and in case there is any violation of the same, complaint can also be made before the Magistrate concerned to remedy the situation.
In view of the above, it is hereby directed that in case arrest of petitioners is to be effectuated and the offence, in which they are wanted, will not entail sentence of more than 7 years, then in that event, concerned police personnel should deal with the matter in compliance of the provisions as contained under Section 41(1)(b) read with Section 41-A of the Cr.P.C.
It is further provided that if the investigation in this matter has been completed and police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. has been filed, the petitioners shall not be entitled to any benefit of this order.
With the above directions, this petition is disposed of finally. Order Date :- 21.2.2019 Sharad/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Harigyan Singh And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 February, 2019
Judges
  • Ram Surat Ram Maurya
Advocates
  • Babu Lal Ram