Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Haridas vs V Perumal

Madras High Court|05 June, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard both sides.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- towards full and final settlement to the respondent.
3. The learned counsel for the respondent also conceded the same and made an endorsement to the effect.
B.GOKULDAS, J.
tsh
4. Recording the submissions so made by the learned counsel on record for both sides, this revision petition is closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
05.06.2017.
tsh To
1. The IV Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai.
2. The V Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.
Crl.RC.No.1029 of 2010 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Haridas vs V Perumal

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 June, 2017
Judges
  • B Gokuldas