Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Hari Narain vs Suryamani Lalchand Commissioner And Other

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 59
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2172 of 2018 Applicant :- Hari Narain Opposite Party :- Suryamani Lalchand Commissioner And 9 Other Counsel for Applicant :- Madan Lal Srivastava
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
The only allegation which is made in this petition is that the private respondents have cut down the standing crops of the applicant on the land in question. This general allegation is made against all the opposite parties which includes the Commissioner, the Superintendent of Police and the Station House Officer concerned. The allegation is wholly vague and devoid of material particulars. Even otherwise, the Court notes that if it be the allegation that crops have been destroyed, the remedy of the applicant lies in lodging a first information report. The present foray in the contempt jurisdiction of this Court is misconceived. The petition is consequently dismissed.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018 Arun K. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Hari Narain vs Suryamani Lalchand Commissioner And Other

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 April, 2018
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Madan Lal Srivastava