Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Hari Chandra vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6486 of 2019 Petitioner :- Hari Chandra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Avijit Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranjal Mehrotra
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
1. Heard Sri Avijit Saxena, learned Counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned Counsel for respondent 2.
2. On 26.11.2018, a demand notice under Section 3 of U.P. Government Electrical Undertakings (Dues Recovery) Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 1958') has been issued to petitioner which is under challenge.
3. It is always open to petitioner, if he has any dispute in respect of amount demanded, to approach Executive Engineer concerned and avail remedy under Para 6.5 of Electricity Supply Code, 2005.
4. Writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 I.A.Siddiqui
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Hari Chandra vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Avijit Saxena