Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Harish Chandra @ Chandu And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 4774 of 2017 Appellant :- Harish Chandra @ Chandu And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Appellant :- Dhirendra Singh Chandel,K.P. Verma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J. Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
Ref:- Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 278773 of 2017 Heard learned counsel for the applicants-appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
In the present case bail is being sought in appeal against the order of conviction.
We have perused the judgment and order dated 3.8.2017 passed by the trial court convicting the appellant.
The contention as raised at the Bar by learned counsel for the appellant is that informant as well as injured in his statement have assigned the role of firing upon the deceased to co-accused Dheeraj; the appellant has been assigned the role of carrying the weapon but the said weapon was not used in the said incident and appellant had not fired. It is next contended that there is every likelihood of the appeal being allowed, however, there is no likelihood of the appeal being heard in near future.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail, however he has not disputed the aforesaid contention as made by the learned counsel for the appellant.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, at this stage, prima facie, a case for bail has been made out. However, the said prima facie view will not in any manner adversely affect the case of the prosecution.
The prayer for bail is granted. The bail application no. 278773 of 2017 is allowed.
Let the applicant-appellants Harish Chandra @ Chandu and Badda convicted and sentenced vide impugned judgment in S.T. No. 55 of 2006 arising out of Case Crime No. 53 of 2005, u/s 307/34, 325, 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3(2) (V) S.C./S.T. (P.A.) Act, P.S. Pahari, District Chitrakoot be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned.
As soon as personal and surety bonds are furnished, photocopies of the same are directed to be transmitted to this Court forthwith by the concerned court to be kept on record.
The applicant - appellant is directed to deposit 50 per cent of the fine within a period of one month from the date of his release from jail. The realization of rest of the fine shall remain stayed during the pendency of the appeal. It is made clear that in case, the fine, as directed, is not deposited within the time as specified above, the same shall be recovered in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 28.2.2018
AK Pandey
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Harish Chandra @ Chandu And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2018
Judges
  • Vipin Sinha
Advocates
  • Dhirendra Singh Chandel K P Verma