Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Harish A Sanil vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|31 August, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL W.P.No.62585/2016 (LR-RES) BETWEEN HARISH A.SANIL AGED 46 YEARS S/O LATE VARIJA POOJARTHI R/AT CHAWTARABAKYAR NINJOOR VILLAGE, NINJOOR POST, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER (By Sri S.K.ACHARYA, ADV.) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL KARKALA UDUPI DISTRICT REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN.
3. P.SAKARAM HEGDE AGED 85 YEARS, S/O SMT KRISHNAMMA SHETTY R/O NO.6, KMESHWARA OPP: MCF HOUSING COLONY P.O. KUNJATHA BAIL MANGALURU-575015 D.K.DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DT.17.3.2016 PASSED IN NO.TRL 495/81-82 ON THE FILE OF THE R-2, LAND TRIBUNAL IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS SCHEDULE LAND IS CONCERNED VIDE ANNX-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. This is the fourth time the matter is listed regarding non- compliance of office objections. Inspite of advance notice being issued, petitioner has not complied with the office objections. Petitioner seems to have lost interest in prosecuting this writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for default and non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE KK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Harish A Sanil vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
31 August, 2017
Judges
  • B S Patil