Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7463 of 2018 Applicant :- Harendra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Chaturvedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Purushottam Maurya, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that applicant was not named in the first information report. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant and a false recovery of Tamancha 315 bore, two live cartridge 315 bore, 4 yellow metal chain have been shown from the possession of the applicant, which are planted and one Samsung J7 mobile is also said to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant, which is of the applicant. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 08.11.2017. It is further submitted that the criminal history of the applicant has been properly explained in para 13 of the affidavit filed in support of bail application.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Harendra involved in Case Crime No. 1235 of 2017, under Section 392, 411 I.P.C., Police Station Sikandera, District Agra be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 26.2.2018 Arti Sharma