Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Hardu Ahin @ Chandra Kali vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 57100 of 2019 Applicant :- Hardu Ahin @ Chandra Kali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Hari Om Sharan Tiwari,Sanjay Shukla,Virendra Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The submission is that the victim has not made any allegation against the applicant except that she took water for the accused. It has been submitted that the allegation against the applicant is that she sent the victim to give water to her brother-in-law (jija) and when she went there she was subjected to rape by the co- accused, Suraj. It has been submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and has assigned a role. The applicant is innocent and is in jail since 01.11.2019 and has no criminal history to her credit.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.
After considering the rival submissions noted hereinabove, larger mandate of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the material brought on record and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Let the applicant- Hardu Ahin @ Chandra Kali, be released on bail in Case Crime No. 627 of 2018, under Sections- 376, 506, 120-B IPC and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act, r/w 15/16 of POCSO Act, Police Station- Mauaima, District- Prayagraj, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 19.12.2019 Rohit
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Hardu Ahin @ Chandra Kali vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2019
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Hari Om Sharan Tiwari Sanjay Shukla Virendra Kumar Pandey