Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2011
  6. /
  7. January

Harbindar Singh Bhatia vs State Of U.P. Thru' Secry., ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|01 February, 2011

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that rent agreement was only for the period of two years. The copy of the agreement is Annexure-1 to the writ petition. Therefore, the demand of stamp duty treating the agreement in perpetuity is wholly unjustified. He has already deposited 1/3rd of the demand. He further submitted that the order has been passed ex-parte.
Learned Standing Counsel prays for and is granted two weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within one week thereafter.
List thereafter.
Till the next date of listing, the realization of demand shall remain stayed.
Order Date :- 1.2.2011 OP
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Harbindar Singh Bhatia vs State Of U.P. Thru' Secry., ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
01 February, 2011
Judges
  • Rajes Kumar

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.