Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Hansu @ Hansraj Chauhan And Others vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 55
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39285 of 2018
Applicant :- Hansu @ Hansraj Chauhan And 3 Others
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And Another. Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for staying the proceeding of Complaint Case No.574 of 2017, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452 IPC, PS Chandwak, District Jaunpur as well as summoning order dated 16.7.2018 pending in the court of A.C.J.M.- Vth, Court No.16, Jaunpur.
The contention of learned counsel for the applicants is that no offence against the applicants is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.
From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283.
The prayer for quashing the proceedings of the aforesaid case as well as the summoning order is refused.
However, it is directed that in case the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them With the above directions, present application is disposed off.
Order Date :- 30.10.2018 IA
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Hansu @ Hansraj Chauhan And Others vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 October, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Dharmendra Kumar Singh