Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Hansraj And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|05 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8054 of 2021 Applicant :- Hansraj And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Pratap Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Vijay Pratap Yadav, learned counsel for applicants and learned A.G.A. for State.
At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant contends that he be permitted to withdraw this application for anticipatory bail.
Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the same.
In view of above, present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 5.4.2021 Saif
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Hansraj And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
05 April, 2021
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Vijay Pratap Yadav

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.