Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Hansraj Nishad vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 46864 of 2018 Applicant :- Hansraj Nishad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Sumer Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and the learned A.G.A.
This petition is filed by the petitioner for quashing the chargesheet No. 195 dated 25-11-2015 in Case No. 1401 of 2016(State Vs Hansraj Nishad) and cognizance order dated 23-07-2016, in case crime no. 0261 of 2015,under sections 406 and 506 IPC, Police Station-Khaga, District-Fatehpur, pending before the court of Judicial Magistrate,Khaga, District-Fatehpur.
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case bail application of petitioner is considered expeditiously in accordance with law.
In view thereof, it is provided that if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail, the Court below will consider the same, in accordance with law in view of the observations made in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in [2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC)].
For a period of three weeks, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.
With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 AKS (Vivek Chaudhary,J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Hansraj Nishad vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Chaudhary
Advocates
  • Ram Sumer Chaudhary