The petitioner claims that he is a qualified practitioner of Electro-Homeopathy. It is further submitted no law commands that the petitioner shall obtain any registration from any statutory body to practice Electro-Homeopathy. The petitioner relies on Exts.P7 and P8 judgments of this Court and submits that the petitioner is entitled to practice Electro-Homeopathy. However, it is submitted that the second respondent and the officials attached to the second respondent and the police officials are interfering with the peaceful practice of Electro-Homeopathy by the petitioner. This Court in Ext.P8 judgment held that the State shall not interfere in the practice of Electropathy/Electro-Homeopathy by the writ petitioner therein. However, it is made clear that W.P.(C) No.31058 of 2014 2 such practitioner shall not use the designation like Doctors etc. and shall not practice modern principles. Therefore, it is clear that the petitioner can practice Electro-Homeopathy. However, he shall not use any designation like Doctor or shall not indulge in modern medicine of Homeopathy or any other Indian System of Medicine which require a registration under the law.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln