It is the case of the petitioner that he wants to renovate her house, which has been objected to and obstructed by the third respondent. In this regard, the petitioner has given a representation dated 14.02.2017 and has filed this petition for police protection.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side).
3.The learned Government Advocate submitted that on the complaint given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted, in which, the petitioner and the third respondent have been called for enquiry. During the enquiry, the third respondent has given an undertaking that he will not unnecessarily cause disturbance to the petitioner and that he will settle alkl dispute before the civil Court. Recording the submission of the petitioner and the third respondent, the police has closed the enquiry on 12.01.2017. In the closure report, it is clearly stated that the police have cautioned the third respondent not to cause unnecessary hindrance and disturbance to the petitioner herein. Recording the same, this petition is closed with a further direction to the police to ensure that no harm be falls the petitioner from the third respondent. A copy of the closure report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar.
To:
1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District
2.The Inspector of Police Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai..