Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Hajarimal Multimal H Sampathraj vs The Deputy Commissioner Bangalore District And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|07 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.8548/2012 (KLR – RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
M/s HAJARIMAL MULTIMAL H.SAMPATHRAJ REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, AT No.59, PULIYAR KOIL STREET, ASHOKNAGAR, BANGALORE-25, REP BY SRI K.NARAYANASWAMY, GPA HOLDER OF H.SAMPATHRAJ, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS. ... PETITIONER [BY SRI SIDDAPPA V.D. ADV. FOR SRI G.D.ASWATHANARAYANA, ADV.] AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT, BANGALORE 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION BANGALORE 3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE 4. SRI R.SRINIVASA REDDY S/O RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, MAJOR 5. SRI ASHWATHA REDDY S/O RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, MAJOR 6. SMT.RADHAMMA D/O RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, MAJOR RESPONDENT Nos.4 TO 6 ARE R/AT No.521, 5TH CROSS HMT LAYOUT, R.T.NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032.
7. SMT.NARAYANAMMA W/O LATE NARAYANA REDDY, MAJOR 8. SRI RAMASWAMY REDDY S/O PATEL CHOWDA REDDY, MAJOR RESPONDENT Nos.7 & 8 ARE R/AT CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 9. SMT.NANJAMMA W/O LATE C.RAMAIAH REDDY, MAJOR 10. SRI MUNI REDDY 11. SRI GOVINDA REDDY 12. SRI JAYAPPA REDDY 13. SRI LOKESH REDDY 14. SRI SRINIVASA REDDY 15. SRI KESHAVA REDDY RESPONDENT Nos.10 TO 15 ARE S/O LATE C.RAMAIAH REDDY, MAJORS 16. LALITHAMMA 17. SUNANDAMMA 18. PREMA 19. PARVATHAMMA RESPONDENT Nos.16 TO 19 ARE D/O LATE C.RAMAIAH REDDY, MAJORS RESPONDENT Nos.9 TO 19 ARE R/AT CHOWDAIAH BLOCK CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI HEBBAL, BANGALORE 20. SMT.SAROJAMMA W/O LATE RAMAKRISHNA REDDY MAJOR, R/AT No.408, 3RD MAIN HMT COLONY, ANANDA NAGAR, BANGALORE …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI T.S.MAHANTESH, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-3;
SMT. NALINA, ADV., FOR SRI S.K.VENKATAREDDY, ADV. FOR R5 & R20;
SRI M.R.VIJAYARAGHAVAN, ADV. FOR R-4 TO R-6 (ABSENT);
R-7 TO R-11 AND R-13 TO R-19 ARE SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R1 IN RP NO.82/11-12 DATED 23.01.2012 VIDE ANNX-A AND ALSO THAT OF THE ORDER PASSED BY R3 IN CASE NO.MR NO.10/07-08 DATED 21.09.2007 VIDE ANNX-C.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition as not pressed.
Memo is placed on record. Permission granted. Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE PMR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Hajarimal Multimal H Sampathraj vs The Deputy Commissioner Bangalore District And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
07 January, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha