Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Hafizulla Khan And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|11 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT W.P.NOS.6920-6921 OF 2019 (EDN EX) BETWEEN 1. HAFIZULLA KHAN, S/O SANAULLA KHAN, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RAJIV GANDHI PARA MEDICAL COLLEGE, A.V.K. COLLEGE ROAD, DISTRICT DAVANAGERE - 570 286.
2. DILEEPA S/O B.S.DEVARAJ NAIK, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RAJIV GANDHI PARA MEDICAL COLLEGE, A.V.K. COLLEGE ROAD, DISTRICT DAVANAGERE - 570 286. ... PETITIONERS (BY SMT.SARASWATHI, ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT MEDICAL EDUCATION, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2. THE DIRECTOR, MEDICAL EDUCATION, ANAND RAO CIRCLE, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009.
3. KARNATAKA NURSING AND PARA MEDICAL REGULATION, AUTHORITY (ACT- 2012), REPRESENTED BY COMPETATIVE AUTHORITY, PARA MEDICAL BOARD BENGALURU, NO.5, NEW NO.40/20A, LAKSHMI COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, OPP: VANI VILAS HOSPITAL, BENGALURU - 560 002.
4. KARNATAKA NURSING AND PARA MEDICAL SCIENCES, EDUCATION (REGULATION) AUTHORITY, REPERSENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY, NO.5, NEW NO. 40/20A, LAKSHMI COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, OPP: VANI VILAS HOSPITAL, BENGALURU - 560 002. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA FOR R1 & R2 AND SRI.YOGESH NAYAK, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT OR ORDER TO THE R-3 TO ACCEPT THE EXAMINATION FEES OF THE PETITIONERS AND TO PERMIT THE PETITIONERS FOR APPEARANCE IN EXAMINATION WHICH WILL BE HELD IN THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-A DTD:20.12.2018 AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioners asserts and the learned Addl. Govt. Advocate Smt.Pramodhini Kishan on request appearing for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 and also the learned Panel Counsel Sri.Yogesh Nayak on request appearing for Respondent Nos.3 & 4, do not much dispute that the subject matter of these Writ Petitions is substantially similar to the one in cognate W.P.Nos.342-346/2019 (Edn-Ex), disposed off by this court vide judgment dated 03.01.2019, a copy whereof is at Annexure – D. Therefore, nothing much remains for adjudication in this case, which needs to be disposed off in terms of the said judgment.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition succeeds in part; a Writ of Mandamus issues to the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 to accept the examination fees, if tendered by the petitioner on or before 16.02.2019, if they are otherwise eligible.
Costs made easy.
cbc SD/- JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Hafizulla Khan And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
11 February, 2019
Judges
  • Krishna S Dixit