Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt H V Narayanamma vs Smt H V Renuka Devi W/O Munishamappa And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|17 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.2112 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SMT.H.V.NARAYANAMMA W/O.LATE RAMAIAH D/O.LATE H.V.VENKATARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT BYAPPANAHALLI (SRINIVASAPURA) VILLAGE JALA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH (ADDITIONAL) TALUK BENGALURU-562 149 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI N.R.RAGHAVENDRA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT.H.V.RENUKA DEVI W/O.MUNISHAMAPPA D/O.LATE H.V.VENKATARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT KRISHNAMANA HOSURU VILLAGE JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI SHIDLGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 2. SRI MANOHAR H.M. S/O.MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT KRISHNAMANA HOSURU VILLAGE JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI SHIDLGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 3. SMT.GAYATHRI D/O.SRI MUNNAJI RAO W/O.SRI R.RAMU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 4. SRI R. RAMU S/O.SRI A.M.RAJU PILLAI AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 5. SRI ABHILASH S/O.SRI R. RAMU AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 6. SRI AVINASH S/O.SRI R. RAMU AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R3 TO R6 ARE RESIDING AT NO.2, 3RD CROSS BHARATHI LAYOUT S.G.PALYA, DRC POST BENGALURU-560 029 7. M/S.SANKESHWAR ASSOCIATES (JKC) NO.26, C S I COMPOUND 2ND CROSS, NEW MISSION ROAD BEHIND UNITY BUILDING BENGALURU-560 027 REP. BY ITS PARTNER SRI RAKESH JAIN S/O.SRI BHAWARAL JAIN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT NO.123 BINDU ANOMOL APARTMENTS OPP. TO SHOBA HOSPITAL NAGARBHAVI MAIN ROAD BENGALURU-560 040 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI P.N.RAJESWARA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R7) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 13.09.2017 (ANNEXURE-E) PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDLAGATTA (EARLIER CHINTHAMANI) ON IA.NO.IV IN OS.NO.61/2015 AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER In view of available alternative remedy against the impugned order, the writ petition is disposed off reserving liberty to the petitioner to file Civil Revision Petition.
2. Registry to return the impugned order to the petitioner forthwith after retaining a copy thereof in the file.
3. It is needless to mention that the period spent in the prosecution of the petition shall be discounted while computing the period of limitation prescribed for filing the Civil Revision Petition. All contentions are kept open.
Sd/- JUDGE KTY
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt H V Narayanamma vs Smt H V Renuka Devi W/O Munishamappa And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
17 October, 2019
Judges
  • Krishna S Dixit