IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2018 (RES) BETWEEN:
SARDAR SON OF ABDUL REHMAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS SCRAP MERCANT HALAGURU VILLAGE, AND HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI. SYED ABDUL SABOOR., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
H. I. SHAMSUDDIN SON OF LATE ISMAIL SAB, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS RESIDENT OF HALAGURU VILLAGE & HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AT MALLAWALLI IN RA 13/16 DATED 10.08.2017 AND THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY IN OS 275/2012 DATED 08.09.2014.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 12.09.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SD/- JUDGE nv Ct:sr