IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No. 160 OF 2018 (POS) Between:
MRS H. SEETHA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS PROP MAYUR GARMENTS D NO.16-1-51/15 GROUND FLOOR BHOOMICA TOWERS (PLAZA COMPLEX) KANKANDY MANGALURU.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI. KESHAVA BHAT A., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) And:
MR K. S. GANAPTHI BHAT SON OF LATE SEETHARAM BHAT AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/AT BHOOMI NIVAS JAIN COMPOUND ATTAVAR MANGALURU.
... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE OF IIIA ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT MANGALURU. D.K DATED 24.10.2017 PASSED ON R.A. NO. 126/2013 AFFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C AT MANGALURU, D.K DATED 10.06.2013 IN OS NO. 469/2011 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 11.09.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this preemptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SA Ct:sr Sd/- Judge