IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH OF AUGUST, 2019 Before THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1282 OF 2016 (DEC/INJ) Between:
1. H.S. BETTAIAH SON OF SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS.
2. GANESH SON OF H.S.BETTAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS.
3. YASHODAMMA WIFE OF H.S.BETTAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.
4. GEETHA DAUGHTER OF H.S.BETTAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT CHOWDESHWARI TEMPLE BEEDI KOTE, HOLENARASIPUR TOWN HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 201.
(BY SRI. GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADVOCATE) And:
L. SURESH SON OF LATE H.D.LAKSHMANAIAH ... APPELLANTS AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS RESIDING AT CHOWDESHWARI TEMPLE BEEDI, KOTE, HONENARASIPUR TOWN HASAN – 573 201.
(BY SRI. VIGNESHWAR S. SHASTRI, ADVOCATE) ... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.02.2016 PASSED IN RA NO. 07 OF 2010 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, HOLENARASIPUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.03.2010 PASSED IN OS NO. 03 OF 2007 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, HOLENARASIPUR.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment The memo dated 7.8.2019 is filed by the learned counsel for the appellants, and it is stated that the parties are able to amicably settle the dispute. Therefore, the appellants are not interested in prosecuting this appeal. As such, the appeal be dismissed as not pressed.
2. Memo is accepted. The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
3. In view of dismissal of the appeal, IA No.2/2016 does not survive for consideration and the same is dismissed.
Sd/- Judge SA Ct:sr