IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR W.P.NOS.15414-15415/2017 (LB RES) c/w W.P.NO.51317/2016 (LB RES) IN W.P.NOS.15414-15415/2017 BETWEEN 1. H R CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE RUDREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT BALEGADDE LAYOUT SAKALESHPURA TOWN HASSAN DISTRICT - 32.
2. SMT. M.L.NAGARATHANA W/O H.R.CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT BALEGADDE LAYOUT SAKALESHPURA TOWN, HASSAN DISTRICT - 32.
(BY SRI PRATHEEP K C, ADV.) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYATH RAJ M.S.BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 01 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
... PETITIONERS 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYATH SAKALESHPURA HASSAN DISTRICT-573132.
3. THE MALALI GRAM PANCHAYATH MALALI VILLAGE, SAKALESHPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573132 REP. BY ITS PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR T.L, AGA FOR R1, SRI A.NAGARAJAPPA, ADV. FOR R2, SRI JAGADEESH D C, ADV. FOR R3.) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE VIDE IMPUGNED BID NOTIFICATION IN SO FAR AS ITEM NO.2 IS CONCERNED [ANNEXURE-H] PASSED BY THE R-3 ETC.
IN W.P.NO.51317/2016 BETWEEN SMT. PARVATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O LATE SOME GOWDA, R/AT NO 564, MALLIKARJUNA NAGARA, SAKALESHPUR, SAKALESHPUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT.
... PETITIONER (BY SMT. VAIBHAVI, ADV. FOR SRI PRAMODA, ADV.) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYATH RAJ M S BUILDING, DR. B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYATH, SAKALESHPUR - 573132 HASSAN DISTRICT.
3. THE GRAMA PANCHAYATH AANE MAHAL VILLAGE, SAKALESHPUR TALUK - 573132 HASSAN DISTRICT REP. BY ITS PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR T.L, AGA FOR R1, SRI A.NAGARAJAPPA, ADV. FOR R3, R2 – SERVED.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 08.09.2016 ISSUED BY R-3 AT ANNEX-H TO W.P.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the respondent-Panchayath.
2. It is submitted by the learned Counsel that the tender which is impugned before this Court is for the period from 14.04.2017 to 31.03.2018 and that the tender period itself having been completed, the instant writ petitions do not survive for consideration. Hence, it is submitted that the writ petitions have been rendered infructuous.
3. The submission of the learned Counsel is placed on record.
4. In view of the main prayer having been rendered infructuous, the other prayer for mandamus to consider the representations also do not survive for consideration. Accordingly, writ petitions are disposed off as having been rendered infructuous.
KK CT-HR Sd/- JUDGE