IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.14432/2011 (SC/ST) BETWEEN H.NAGARAJAIAH S/O LATE HANUMANTHE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/O HEBBAKKA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI TUMKUR TALUK & DISTRICT …PETITIONER (BY SRI HARISH KUMAR.M.S, ADVOCATE) AND :
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKUR DISTRICT TUMKUR 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TUMKUR SUB-DIVISION TUMKUR 3. VENKATARAMAIAH S/O GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O MANUVINA KURIKE CHANNARAYANA DURGA HOBLI KORATAGERE TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (R1 & R2 ARE SERVED SRI G.BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 17.04.2008 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TUMKUR SUB-DIVISION, TUMKUR, VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TUMKUR DATED 29.11.2010 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the petitioner in this proceedings is dead for almost two years back. It is also stated by him that he has no instructions from the family members of petitioner and after coming to know about the death of petitioner he is filing the present memo.
The memo is taken on record.
Since the petitioner is said to have died, the petition is dismissed as abated. However, it does not take away the right of legal representatives of petitioner to seek revival of this writ petition by filing proper application, if needed.
nd/-
Sd/- JUDGE