IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.454/2016 BETWEEN M/S. H.KRISHNAIAH SHETY & SONS, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, SRI. D.K.MOHAN BABU, FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN, MAJOR, REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HPC KEROSENE WHOLESALE DEALERS, NO.72, II CROSS, I STAGE, II PHASE, MATHIKERE LAYOUT, GOKUL, BANGALORE-560 054. ... PETITIONER (BY SHRI./SMT. V.B. SHIVAKUMAR, ADV.) AND SMT. SHREE SHUBHA G., D/O. BAKARISHNAMA NAIDU G., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. NO.159, 13 ‘B’ MAIN, I STAGE, I PHASE, GOKUL, BANGALORE-560 054, REPRESENTED BY HER ATTORNEY HOLDER, SRI. G.BALAKRISHNAMA NAIDU, S/O. SRI. SIDDAIAH NAIDU, MAJOR BY AGE, R/O. NO.159, 13’B’ MAIN, I STAGE, I PHASE GOKUL, BANGALORE-560 054. … RESPONDENT (BY SHRI./SMT.: S.RANGASWAMY, ADV.) * * * THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27.08..2016 PASSED ON I.A. NO.2 IN MISC. NO.205/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING I.A. NO.2 FILED U/O. 7 RULE 11(d) R/W. SECTION 151 OF CPC., TO DISMISS THE PETITION AS NOT MAINTAINABLE.
THIS CRP COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The petitioner is before this Court, being aggrieved by the order passed by the trial Court on I.A. No.2, preferred under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the evidence has been completed and both the parties have let in evidence. The suit is set for final arguments and hence, it is prayed that the revision petition be disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to expedite the disposal of the original suit itself.
4. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record.
The revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to expedite the hearing and consequential disposal of the suit in O.S. No.920/2005 as expeditiously as possible at any rate within an outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
I.A. No.1/2016 filed for stay does not survive for consideration and the same is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Ksm*