IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.10666 OF 2017 AND 13495-13496 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. H.K.EHTESHAMUL HUQ, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O H.K.KAMILNAYEEMULAHUQ WARD NO.5, HKB ONIONS, ABDUL NAZEER SAB ROAD, GUNDLUPET - 571 111.
2. SHAFIULLA, AGED 71 YEARS, SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLIAMED, S/O. ABDUL SATTAR, NO.232, ZAKIR HUSSAIN NAGAR, CALICUT, GUNDLUPET - 571 111.
3. S.A. AKRAM KHAN, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. H.E. AKBAR KHAN, B.N.ROAD, BESIDES POST OFFICE, GUNDLUPET - 571 111.
(BY MR R.KOTHWAL, ADV.) AND:
1. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKFS, NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 052.
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
…PETITIONERS 2. THE DISTRICT WAKF ADVISORY COMMITTEE, CHAMARAJNAGAR REPRESENTED BY ITS WAKF OFFICER (BY SMT.S.R.ANURADHA, ADV FOR R-1 SRI SYED SUHAIL ALI, ADV FOR R-1 & 2) - - -
… RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 3.2.2017, 5.2.2017, 6.2.2017, 10.2.2017, 14.2.2017, 18.2.2017, 25.2.2017, 27.02.2017 AND 3.3.2017 MADE BY THE PETITIONERS AT ANNEX-A, A1, B, C, D, D1, E, F, G, H, H1 AND J; AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri.R.Kothwal, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Sri.Syed Suhail Ali, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
2. The petitions are admitted for hearing. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the same are heard finally.
3. In these petitions, the petitioners inter alia seek for a direction to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the representations submitted by the petitioners.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and in view of the facts of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the petitions with a direction that suitable action, if not already taken on the representations submitted by the petitioners, shall be taken in accordance with law by the competent authority by a speaking order within four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. With regard to the other reliefs which have been claimed by the petitioners, the petitioners are at liberty to take recourse to such remedy as may be available to them under the law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits.
Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE RV