Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mrs H B Usha vs M/S Nitesh Estates Ltd

High Court Of Karnataka|14 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.31/2019 BETWEEN:
1 . MRS. H. B. USHA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS D/O MR. H.R. BASAVARAJ RESIDING AT NO.26/3, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE 560 020.
2 . MS. BHAVANI HARIMOHAN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS D/O MRS. USHA BASAVARAJ, RESIDING AT NO.26/3, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE 560 020. REPRESENTRED BY HER GPA HOLDER MRS. H.B USHA 3 . MR. CHAITANYA HARIMOHAN AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS S/O MRS. USHA BASAVARAJ R/AT NO.26/3, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE 560 020.
REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER MRS. H.B. USHA 4 . MRS. SUDHA IYENGAR D/O MR. H.B. BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.26/3-4, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE 560 020.
REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER MRS. H. B. USHA 5 . MS. UDITA IYENGAR D/O MRS. SUDHA IYENGAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.26/3-4, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE 560 020.
REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER MRS. H.B. USHA (BY SRI RAJESH, D.G., ADVOCATE FOR SRI SUNDARAMURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND:
M/S NITESH ESTATES LTD., 7TH FLOOR, "NITESH TIMESQUARE", NO.8, M.G. ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MR. L.S. VAIDYANATHAN.
...PETITIONERS …RESPONDENT ....
THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION11(5) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING TO APPOINT JUSTICE ANANDBYRAREDDY (RETD) AS ARBITRATOR OR ANY COMPETENT PERSON WITH A JUDICIAL BACKGROUND, TO BE DULY DESIGNATED AS AN ARBITRATOR TO RESOLVE THE INSTANT DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES IN RESPECT OF JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS DATED 26.06.2012 IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed the Memo dated 08.11.2019 stating that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and therefore, it does not survive for consideration and may be dismissed as not pressed.
2. The Memo is placed on record.
3. The Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
Judge kcm
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mrs H B Usha vs M/S Nitesh Estates Ltd

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
14 November, 2019
Judges
  • B Veerappa Civil