IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No. 1401 OF 2017 (DEC) Between:
SMT H. ANNAPURNAMMA WIFE OF LATE RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESIDENT OF KOLAGHATTA VILLAGE KAVAL, KASABA HOBLI TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 577 501.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI. A. V. AMARNATHAN., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) And:
SMT. RADHAMMA WIFE OF LATE RAMACHANDREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDENT OF BANASANDRA KASABA HOBLI TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 577 501.
... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.03.2017 PASSED IN RA NO. 23/16 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE JMFC TURUVEKERE DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.01.2016 PASSED IN OS NO. 98/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE JMFC., TURUVEKERE.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 03.09.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this preemptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- Judge SA Ct:sr